The Invisible Anti-War Left

By Joe Gruters

Everything is upside down and backwards for Democrats from 2003, and it screams of management incompetence at the top and philosophic corruption on the Left.

Recall that in 2001 and in 2003, President Bush requested and received Congressional approval for the wars in Afghanistan and in Iraq. We did not find the WMD that every nation said was there — which has since colored the Iraq war — but it was 100% constitutional and legal.

Code Pink, Cindy Sheehan, Michael Moore and the rest of the Left cast howled about Bush’s illegal war. U.S. Sen. Barack Obama inveighed against the Iraq surge — which turned out to be wildly successful — and questioned the legality of the war.

Fast forward. President Obama ordered U.S. military forces to attack Libya last year in support of insurgents there wanting to overthrow Col. Muammar Gaddafi. He did so under the NATO umbrella, but without Congressional approval, albiet by “leading from behind,” according to a spokesman.

So far the results have been an apparent Al-Quaida takeover of Libya and the Benghazi slaughter — and following coverup — of our Ambassador to Libya.

The response from the Dixie Chicks anti-war Left that bleated constantly about Bush’s illegal war? Nothing. Quiet as mice.

Now Obama is planning again to order the military to intervene in the Middle East with some sort of strike against Syrian dictator Assad. More than 100,000 people have died in Syria’s civil war and we did not propose acting. But 100 die from a chemical attack and we are planning a military strike. Obama’s reckless comments about a red line put him in the position of using the military to save face, which is just wrong.

And again, Obama feels no compunction to get any approval or consent from Congress. He may back off after Britain’s Prime Minister was rebuffed in a vote of Parliament — yes, the country we broke away from to create our democracy had a vote on their countrymen going to war.

The response from the traditional, college-kid anti-war Left? Nothing. Everything is fine — except forgive all my loans!

Candidate Obama railed against Gitmo and promised to close it because Code Pink and Hollywood the rest of the anti-war left were screaming (laughably) about the abuses and illegalities there. Well, Gitmo is still open because Obama has seen the very obvious need for it. Basically, Bush was right.

And the anti-war Left that heckled Bush relentlessly? Crickets. It’s there guy, so it’s OK. That’s ideological corruption.

What little credibility any of those folks may have had is long gone. They are philosophically weak partisans rooting for their team and against Republicans. And that’s the depth of it. It’s just a shame the media gives them any air time, because they are vacuous.

It’s hard to know what they really believe. Sure, they generally want more government control, higher taxes, weaker laws for criminals, racial strife, welfare dependency, mothers and doctors free to kill unborn babies, a centrally planned economy and making the institution of marriage meaningless. But they will cave anytime for political gain.

This is what most of us conservatives refuse to do. We call our leadership when it travels non-conservative routes and demand an explanation. We make full use of the First Amendment and even go after incumbent officeholders sometimes. If we elect them based on conservative promises and they break those promises, we don’t meekly stay quiet.

It’s why the media thinks it is always seeing division and strife in the Republican Party. It’s because we are full of vibrant ideas and deeply held values and if Mr. Smith goes to Washington and becomes part of the system of destructive, rights-denying big government, we seek someone else to represent the cause of freedom.

This may at times appear to hurt us in a political moment, but it makes us stronger at the core in the long run. Because if we don’t retain our principles…then never mind

It’s obvious, we still do.

Thanks for being informed and engaged.

Advertisements

Romney Ad: We Can’t Afford Four More Years

There is no shortage of videos following last night’s first Presidential debate. This new ad from the Romney team is very well done; great footage, great sound, great tone.

Dismal Employment Numbers Show Need For New Direction

Well lower than expected, a mere 96,000 jobs were created in August. As the numbers lay out, for every one worker that enters the work force, four workers are leaving the work force. I’ll leave it to our loyal readers to let us know how long it will take for those numbers to work out well. The worst number of all may be the number of Americans capable and qualified, yet currently not in the work force: 88,921,000

Obama accepts praise Thursday night in Charlotte.

GPH-Consulting.com pic from NYMag.com
nymag.com

“This is not even close to what a recovery looks like,” Romney’s running mate, Rep. Paul Ryan (R-Wis.), said Friday of the jobs report. – via The Hill.

11.2%: Unemployment rate if labor force participation rate was the same as when Obama took office. – via James Pethokoukis.

Obama waves, feels our pain

GPH-Consulting.com from CNN.com
from CNN.com

Simply stated, there is no reason to believe that four more years of Obama, would be any better than the previous four years of Obama.

– – – –

If you’re so inclined, so extra reading:

Oh my, JPMorgan economist just absolutely destroys the August jobs report

Record 88,921,000 Americans ‘Not in Labor Force’—119,000 Fewer Employed in August Than July

Slow U.S. Hiring May Spur Fed

MISSOURI: CLAIRE MCCASKILL ‘HELPING OBAMA DESTROY COUNTRY’

Rep. Akin: ‘Liberals shocked’ 71% of Missouri voters oppose Obamacare

Listen to this interview with Congressman Todd Akin:

http://player.ooyala.com/player.js?width=400&height=195&embedCode=5qNmZkNTpv8aRHfuBf0upy8wIh-RwgF3&deepLinkEmbedCode=5qNmZkNTpv8aRHfuBf0upy8wIh-RwgF3&video_pcode=9kcm06PtVGNZkFkXR2898mHnBha_

The Reorganization Man

Heading into a three day weekend, Saturday’s Wall Street Journal has a tremendous editorial, The Reorganization Man. Below are a few of the better tidbits from the editorial.

There he was in the East Room, explaining that “the government we have is not the government we need.” That’s for sure, and Mr. Obama even added the Gingrichian theme that “We live in a 21st-century economy, but we’ve still got a government organized for the 20th century. Our economy has fundamentally changed—as has the world—but our government, our agencies, has not.”

——-

Proposals for government reorganization are the elevator music of politics, always present but never leaving much of an impression. Newt Gingrich says he’s running in part to apply Lean Six Sigma best practices to the bureaucracy. Al Gore famously drew up a scheme for “reinventing government” in the late 1990s. He abandoned it after the airline unions revolted amid his attempt to reinvent the Federal Aviation Administration.

——-

This is a President who last year promised a review of all regulations while riding the greatest rule-making wave in American history. Now he’s calling for leaner government without mentioning ObamaCare and Dodd-Frank, which create so many new boards and commissions that government auditors (literally) can’t even count them. We suspect many in the White House were laughing themselves when they came up with this one.